LunagisthubThe Complex Decision of a Jehovah’s Witness Cancer Patient- Auntie Esther
A Nigerian cancer patient, known as Auntie Esther, has sparked controversy on social media after refusing a blood transfusion as part of her treatment, citing her religious beliefs as a Jehovah’s Witness. Despite receiving over ₦30 million in public donations, Auntie Esther opted for a bloodless treatment plan, which is more expensive and time-consuming .
Auntie Esther’s decision was made in accordance with her faith, which prohibits blood transfusions. Her medical team presented her with two treatment options: a standard protocol that included a blood transfusion, which was fully covered by the donated funds, or a more expensive, bloodless treatment plan. Auntie Esther chose the latter, aligning with her religious convictions .
The patient’s decision has sparked a heated debate on social media, with many donors expressing outrage and disappointment. Some have requested refunds, arguing that their donations were intended to support life-saving treatment, not alternative therapies. Others have defended Auntie Esther’s right to make her own medical decisions, citing her autonomy and constitutional rights .
Auntie Esther’s medical team has expressed concerns about the implications of her decision, noting that declining a blood transfusion may worsen her prognosis. However, her medical team is working with her to optimize her blood levels and prepare her for chemotherapy .
The case highlights the importance of respecting patient autonomy and religious freedom. While some have criticized Auntie Esther’s decision, others have argued that she has the right to make her own choices about her treatment. The donated funds will still be used to cover her medical expenses, despite the controversy .
Lunagisthub
